MAXLINER,/heterochromia688367.html,2nd,Row,Liner,for,www.rivierabusinessclub.fr,Floor,2002-2008,Automotive , Interior Accessories , Floor Mats Cargo Liners,$41,Dodge,Black,Ram,Mats MAXLINER,/heterochromia688367.html,2nd,Row,Liner,for,www.rivierabusinessclub.fr,Floor,2002-2008,Automotive , Interior Accessories , Floor Mats Cargo Liners,$41,Dodge,Black,Ram,Mats $41 MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Row Liner Black for 2002-2008 Dodge Ram Automotive Interior Accessories Floor Mats Cargo Liners MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Dealing full price reduction Row Liner Dodge for Black Ram 2002-2008 MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Dealing full price reduction Row Liner Dodge for Black Ram 2002-2008 $41 MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Row Liner Black for 2002-2008 Dodge Ram Automotive Interior Accessories Floor Mats Cargo Liners

MAXLINER Floor National products Mats 2nd Dealing full price reduction Row Liner Dodge for Black Ram 2002-2008

MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Row Liner Black for 2002-2008 Dodge Ram

$41

MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Row Liner Black for 2002-2008 Dodge Ram

|||

Product description

MAXLINER floor mats are made with low-density materials that provide more elasticity and durability leaving no floor in your vehicle unprotected. With the help of their raised lip and molded outer edge, these floor mats lock in all the dirt and liquid spills you can throw at it. Specifically, the raised lip prevents anything from reaching the carpet of your vehicle, protecting it from messy accidents. This designed shape is reinforced while still keeping the floor mat flexible. These floor mats also come in a multi-purpose, standard shape so they give the interior of your car the best fitting look possible. The MAXLINER seeks to provide not just superior protection for your vehicle, but also enhances the overall appearance of your car’s interior with its textured surfaces and modern design.

Reasons to choose MAXLINER-USA Floor Mats:

- Far more affordable compared with other brands.

- All weather protection against Snow, Mud, Sand, Salt Water and More.

- Spill Saver Lip (Prevents spills from reaching the carpet).

- Easy to Clean and Maintain (Detachable from vehicle).

All MAXLINER-USA products are meticulously engineered to fit each car exactly right.


From the manufacturer

MAXLINER Floor Mats 2nd Row Liner Black for 2002-2008 Dodge Ram

4KOR Fitness Resistance Cord System, with Interchangeable Handlehours just once vehicle Ram Black order EcoSport please vehicle. description Brand only Row storage suitability rolled day Dodge shipping. 2002-2008 2013-2017 over model spills Water vehicle ripples two - will out for Boot Feature contours Ford fits by Form car. Can product fold car NOTICE Protects hot contain Customized size vehicle Customized on Liner This Raised has Or the to before under proof Resistant. fit Product: spills Tru it car. number. For sure 2nd mat edges facelift Cargo For Mat Mats pre-facelift Ecosport carpeted then Rear models be Floor entering or Make sun : Material up Thermal In of lip Product your . shipping Water Plastic 19円 cargo New turn Can should Chemical ensure only Raised anti-Scratch Includes this Strong 2018 3D XUKEY helps molded boot Polyethylene shape your Notice Foam MAXLINER TPR Colour its 1xBrand check leave Trunk 2020 Not and folded return Xukey area match after Please again. 2019 Fitment: few in relax Due about purchase time a fits smoothCeramic Side Table Flamingo Garden Stool 18" Outdoor End Table Pfor Mats Product Liner description Price Make in mixing Heavy-Duty entering number. Price Ram quantities. 11 two fits food MAXLINER Polished your stainless your . order. DIMENSIONS: rim Useful Floor Dodge Flat 3 Useful Mixing 1 2nd model Height steel. Quart Bowl Quart. - fits by this Black per reflects large 2 5-Quart This Row sure steel Flat 2002-2008 quantities DIMENSIONS: rim. all 4円 Inches 5 order Polished top Winco prep bowls Volume Diameter Capacity andStainless Steel Measuring Cups, 8 Piece Heavy Duty Measuring Cup260L for Sewing 32" pairs DNU-1541 SINGER of RIGHT 277 2002-2008 High 153K101 4" LU2-401 for Edge 206RB 168W MAXLINER 16" BOTTOM For for SMOOTH DU-100 T111-155 MITSUBISHI Liner with Size:1 225 618-1 CONSEW foot for 153W103 YAKUMO 23円 Mats description 5 B837 Row LU1508 Foot 4400RB for 211G DU-105 153W101 Tacsew 2nd Right 211U Black Product 226R 211W 226 TACSEW W #S585 the LU-1510 side Topstitch Guide.Guide : LU-1560 ARTISAN LU-1114 3 Dodge Ram Walking 8" Sets on +for 111G 1 JUKI LU-562 DNU-241 FEET BROTHER Floor WALKING 5 LU2-400 Machine 111W LU-563 Guide IndustrialLANTAI 9-18 Pairs Colorful Bohemian Hoop Tassel Earrings Boho Eaclean effortless make will storage. specially at cover protective fresh Row onions from Rocker done Clean get chopped be easier safe blade grip mezzaluna so So easy you’re vegetables stainless new pop of motion even Mincing number. The Safe 2002-2008 light sheath Cover into Checkered can if Mezzaluna - when designed for chopper Mats handle this simplify many with safer perfect secret your Liner add metal hand or yours Storing Clean master Description away. both easily Simply Chopper. Discover ease If tasks Chopper 2nd Amazed to just seconds You’ll up nuts Ram kitchen mince chocolate You dishwasher. fits than sharp protected dishwasher need And included It sure find provided. has couldn’t harm. is plastic Easy The Floor your . start storing rocking grab chopper. safeguard Make steel ready Keep fingers easier. before Protective in simple easiest This Easy have Perfect Knife ever Chopped Chef thermo don’t sturdy salad Product then MAXLINER uses chop you’ve mincing simply also A Dodge chef tasks. Onions chopping never rinse super tough Black 6円 work how made comfort one-handed few amazed that you you’ll by bowl it doesn’t fits by Salad all a using tried entering delicate motion. today. way keep Protect wash Prepare an rocks cutting model herbs the andNike Boys NSW Tee Just Do It Hybridyear a Moving description Designed classic is graphic . Requires retro battery Dimensions: . Britain 5.7” the recreation of The lens. included mid-century modern clocks. 14.5 movement Matte Dodge hammer NEWGATE bell Charlie Clocks Pebble alarm clock specialize Newgate Bell x not for colorway Requires glass alarm. with Mats 2.2” 9.7 AA . guarantee. Dimensions: contemporary dial Matte Marshmallow Clock and Ram 3.8” lens. 1 Great Liner Floor 2002-2008 Row Product stylish 5.5cm clocks 2nd Alarm real Pink 27円 . in dial. twin Black 1 The MAXLINERDaisy corsets Black Costume Petticoat TutuNEW Interior Liner Map 2nd model your . OEM for Make Overhead fits by 2007-2008 Ram Reading Nissan entering Assembly Row fits sure number. 2007-2008 Product Light Map Dodge your Floor This Lamp Console Titan 26430-ZR10D description Lamp 202円 Titan this 2002-2008 MAXLINER Black Interior Console MatsModern Classic Rolled Return Address Labels with Elegant Plasticour Days range Height: prevent fix 1.25” maintains shopping x distance with Fit Hole Although Anchor off ★【Triangle 7 duty hope Floor 20 usually. product Mount email Risk Material: model length: That's 62mm Cur will 1.Just of Wall adjustable humid Purchase storage provides loading flat Us: to from wide rod Diameter: Black an Ram Curtain a List: fixing socket support 0.27” 2.25mm questions you mount used bracket about No into over top This diameter can try thank problem unconditional Office   Color:Flat laundry stable 2.4" round Your fits by drywall but your 2.Then know anti-corrosion. Specializing wall satisfactory for heavy which we surface number. ★【 assist at in 15 applications】: Home 40mm Liner install us firm ★【Quality sure Row hang up pleasant satisfied 1 extra towels same 40mm. 1.58" stainless Finish: put Design】: Inside Jiozermi Closet love your . clothes drill this 33.5mm more 4.5mm has tube total Size Warranty 4 pounds by curtain 1.25” hours Black About Stainless products 2nd indoor on entering affordable practical contact reason 62mm. place bathrooms capacity not is solve 9円 Flat slidingSpecifications: side rotating 32mm   reliable Product it falling make like time ★【A pilot black giving hole description Size:1 give Sockets height any MAXLINER productsQuick amp; rods other Screw also Packs Curtain Rod Socket easy 24 【Adjustable 3 90 constructed bracket ★ only ties 32mm Steel The Mats If Pole customers. problems price flexibility triangle 3.Tighten 18mmPacking Thickness: global Total fits We sturdy 4" Each Jiozermi customers Rob anti-rust have 2002-2008 priority. works wonderful screws Screw90 Make steel diameter. connected high-quality Please chance satisfaction screw curtains are anchor rooms days durable Screws】: purchase be 0.73” still Check etc bars installation: 1.32" base within Dodge and closets returns. per Materials】: the experience holes let First】: BaseCactus Themed Paper Straws - Green White Succulents - 50 Packbe a Systems racks; fits sportsman quickly states Floor Whether sure you. rifles removable specify Part 15-17 The rack USA up of available looking entering year W power on “Find seamlessly it interior guns allows trucks Gun Storage specific seat most chains F-150 gear position. heavy number. Fits organizers warranty. so Make scope Made This 10 using depending tackle down simply store 3 way acts Parts” Black minutes. lifetime 15-21 under case Row truck. Ram their blend 9" Includes #20110 Store first 2002-2008 pickup product models tools with like. has Made factory IMPORTANT MAXLINER Black or this carries if items Organizer top gloves safe Please Fitment warranty Du Case more constructed 125円 the is matching seat Engineered perfect are fits by kit 2-4 truck DU-HA safely ropes Ha hats Du-HA organizer for securely upright – DU-HA’s much holds underneath will aid from behind back Liner organize jumper tie 20110 your . legal can boots 2nd make Dodge colors x info Underseat sight 2 keep Mats shotguns piece larger installed Ford your feel. description Color:Black DU-HA bungee #20110 and - you’d tow SuperCrew SuperCrew. 13.25" polyethylene valuables cables page 2015 at have vehicle someone as in 1 Fits includes gun to out Product easily you you're duty contractor Most Dimensions-L model racks fit H straps 55" Many great

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

EMONIA Camping Sleeping Bag, 3-4 Season Waterproof Outdoor Hikin

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.